Is this some kind of actually new IM, or yet another fork of XMPP/Conversations?
Is this some kind of actually new IM, or yet another fork of XMPP/Conversations?
I think “identities” used on Gemini (at least the way they are implemented in Lagrange browser) are the best implementation of a similar idea, but, you know, it’s only supported in Gemini.
So pretty much same as ssh/gpg private/public keys? Do many websites support this? I don’t remember seeing any that would give me an option to register using passkeys. Also, where are the private keys stored? How do I move them from device to device (for example, I signed up on android and now want to log in on desktop)? Do I back them up and restore when I’m buying a new phone?
Sorry for being silly here, I’ve been kind of out of the loop with recent technology, what exactly is “passkeys”? I remember reading something when it was announcement, but all I saw was lots of buzzwords and vague “it’s new and it’s very good” claims.
Is it like, an alternative authorization method? Is it a second factor after I type my login/password, or does it replace passwords? What does it look like, from users perspective?
the idea of being a true second brain
It’s good that it’s built with this idea, but what is the actual implementation of this idea? What features make it «a true second brain» that other «second brain» apps (obsidian and hundred other note taking apps) don’t have?
I never encountered jxl in the wild so I don’t know which apps support it, but if somehow you found a jxl file and don’t know how to view it, this one works:
https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/fr.oupson.jxlviewer
I really liked T9 keyboard, until I tried to type stuff like URLs, emails, passwords etc.
Is there non “appimage” linux release?
Great release.
However I’m still waiting for snapping/alignment/distribution to be usable. Right now, some things override others (even when holding a modifier to constrain node to an axis, it will snap to things that are not aligned with the axis), and because of visual vs geometric bounding box when resizing things it will snap to align with other shapes but when you let go of LMB, the object won’t be aligned anyway (so what was the point of snapping in the first place).
Also sometimes things will snap to a guideline from a mile away, when things I’m trying to move are nowhere close to a guideline.
I’m coming drom other software (specifically, Corel Draw) and understand it’s not fair to compare different tools and demand from one to mimic the other, especially when Inkscape is FOSS and Corel Draw is a commercial product made by paid developers. And you could also say most of things I’m complaining about are muscle memory things because I’ve been using Corel for years and need to let go of old habits and get used to Inkscape if I want to switch to it rather than demand Inkscape to be more Corel like.
But I still believe Corel does some things just right. I pretty much never needed to turn off snapping in Corel and “it just worked”™, objects would never snap to a guide on the other side of the screen and constrained nodes (when holding Shift) would still both be constrained to axis and snap to objects, meaning it snaps on the intersection of the other object and the axis I’m moving along.
Also if I’m resizing a box and the edge snaps to a guide, when I let go, in Corel the edge of the box will 100% be aligned with the guide, unlike in Inkscape.
I’m pretty sure some of these issues are because of Geometric vs Visual bounding box differences, and it’s good we can at least choose between the two: Corel can’t even deal with visual bounding boxes IIRC. You work with geometric bounding box only.
I think adding the toggle somewhere in the toolbar would be a great thing so that we don’t have to go into the menu and find it every time, maybe even a hotkey to toggle between the two.
I’d say there’s nothing ridiculous in expecting FOSS thing to be as good as non FOSS, both are made by human after all, yes more work is done by paid developers than by enthusiasts, but there’s nothing impossible about FOSS software being as good as non FOSS.
What’s ridiculous is that people expect one software to behave the same as other software when the FOSS software does not imply in any way that it is a clone of a proprietary software and that it strives to behave the same way / be a direct replacemen. Like, yes, Inkscape is a great vector editor, but noone says it’s an Illustrator clone. You can ditch Illustrator and use Inkscape, but it isn’t a direct replacement, stuff will be different.
There are “free clones”, like double Commander is a clone of Total Commander, and in this case it is valid to expect one to behave exactly like another.
To be honest I can’t give any answer, but I tried Paisa and it felt sketchy, so I decided to use GNUCash.
Hey, QR Scanner you linked is pretty good. Even has the option to share contacts into the app to generate QR code for them, which is something not every QR app can do well.
Thanks for the recommendation, I think I’ll use this now.
I convert from docx to md specifically with the purpose of getting rid of Microsoft formatting aka almost converting to plaintext but preserve at least some structure.
It’s been there since forever.
What are you trying to achieve?
Yggdrasil allows to make P2P connections between any 2 devices.
Which is totally unfair imo.
I think Google should rename their company and products to not be confused with Gnome.
Man, I want to try it so bad, but I don’t have a thousand EUR…