this is fully platonic
this is fully platonic
High demand will drive efficiency gains in subsequent generations. It’ll be like how processors today use a tiny fraction of the power that processors a decade ago used for the same amount of work. Better instruction sets, architectures and smaller lithography has driven efficient and competitive computing. Similar will happen for AI processors
I know you want to complain about unethical billionaires but the point here is about looking for a trend between ethics and income, not prevalence of unethical behaviour amongst billionaires
For this research it doesn’t matter how much wealth they control if it’s not even a suburb sized group of people globally who are billionaires, median income for ethical vs inethical groups would probably not move any statistically significant amount
Recent advancements using “dynamic sparsity” or “selective activation” approaches increase efficiency beyond “brute force”. This is how China began to compete without anywhere near the number of GPUs or power.
Interesting, the follow-ups all together paint quite a different picture than the above quote/blog post
Billionares would have no bearing whatsoever on the same type of research being discussed. See my other comment.
That’s a different argument. We are talking about whether ethics is a direct factor in income. Billionaires are outliers. In a population study of millions of people, or even a survey of hundreds, billionaires aren’t going to have any bearing on the outcome.
Anecdotes aren’t evidence, and we all have anecdotes, but a counter anecdote would be I have seen people who take unethical choices experience reduced income due to loss of job offers, dismissal from existing jobs, criminal penalties, loss of contacts and relationships.
Do you reckon openai could get cheaper power or gpus? Or something else? Could nvidia get lower production costs for these?
Replication studies reveal important details
Doesn’t provide a source
Ya got a source though? Like everyone knows sociopaths are great at CEO and other executive roles, but what does the same plot look like for ethics
Cost efficiency is all there is now
That’s the only thing on the list that has reason to be restricted lol the rest should be parental discretion
Wtf is match
Vendors packaging OpenSSH open up even more vulnerabilities that the devs of OpenSSH can’t protect you from. See the recent xz poisoned OpenSSH packages
Exposing SSH is not recommended, it’s a hot attack target. Expose a VPN and use that to SSH in.
That’s great, do you put it behind a reverse proxy?
I just pay for ente to host for me so I like the E2EE. If I self hosted I would consider Immich with media stored in an encrypted zfs volume
Why stop there