Words in which I can never remember h and g order:

• length thought tough through

Inconsistent pronunciation of “ae”

• steak read bear bleak

And many more…

As you say, once you can build a nand gate, you can go everywhere.

If OP wants to know how, I suggest this way which I found useful and entreating:

https://www.nand2tetris.org/

This should be what you are looking for

https://f-droid.org/packages/cl.coders.faketraveler/

Perfect representation, a classic, thanks

I didn’t know this particular stereotype about Finland! Why is that?

if you have a sauna, too, it’s Finland

Cars.

They are everywhere, they take for themselves the majority of public space in urban areas and they are incredibly dangerous, noisy, expensive. Yet majority of people barely notice them

As @donjuanme@lemmy.world mentions, I swim with goggles, it’s much better. Morever since I was having issues in the pool with clorinated (I’m not sure it’s the correct term) water I also use a nose clip. But when swimming in the sea (Mediterranean sea, no ocean, usually) i don’t mind the water in the nose, as I told, I usually keep it out by slow expiration, so that air pressure keeps water out. But a good mask covering your nose would be a good solution too, as suggested by @donjuanme@lemmy.world

TL;DR when you learn breathing in the right way, crawling is the best

I began swimming regularly 10 years ago or so. Nothing serious, just a couple of times a week, to try to keep my back in shape (spoiler: it wasn’t enough for that but it is really good for heart and lungs)

Well, initially I found that backstroke was better for me too, because I wasn’t able to breath regularly during crawl and I wasn’t comfortable having my head in the water all the time (and water in the nose… Not a good feeling)

In the long run I learnt to breath well, and to gently push air out from the nose while the head was down. So now I feel much better crawling than backstroking. In the sea even more, because while backstroking, a wave can hit my face and send water in the nose easily, and this doesn’t happen while crawling.

Then, to each their own, but this was my experience

It should be possible to connect ghost 6 to the fediverse, so that anyone with mastodon, lemmy etc should be able to comment, like etc

https://ghost.org/6/

No opinion, but I suggest you watch the movie “Gattaca” if you didn’t already

I draw the concept, or write down the formula or even a sentence, on a shared board/screen etc. So I can clearly show my understanding and check where the other person understanding is different.

It means that we have to work together to come to a common understanding.

There is no need to express opinions when we have good estimates for both your questions:

Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? -> https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector

individual solutions reviewed and assessed by Project Drawdown, including their relevant sector(s) and their impact on reducing heat-trapping gases -> https://drawdown.org/solutions/table-of-solutions

Both the links above are from a very interesting video on the topic that I suggest to take a look at. Also the whole channel is really interesting and well done -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReXaS4QausQ

Even if LLM “neurons” and their interconnections are modeled to the biological ones, LLMs aren’t modeled on human brain, where a lot is not understood.

The first thing is that how the neurons are organized is completely different. Think about the cortex and the transformer.

Second is the learning process. Nowhere close.

The fact explained in the article about how we do math, through logical steps while LLMs use resemblance is a small but meaningful example. And it also shows that you can see how LLMs work, it’s just very difficult

Yes, that’s it. I added the link in the OP,

Very arrogant answer. Good that you have intuition, but the article is serious, especially given how LLMs are used today. The link to it is in the OP now, but I guess you already know everything…

Thank you. I found the article, linkin the OP

Oh wow thank you! That’s it!

I didn’t even remember now good this article was and how many experiments it collected

I’m aware of this and agree but:

• I see that asking how an LLM got to their answers as a “proof” of sound reasoning has become common

• this new trend of “reasoning” models, where an internal conversation is shown in all its steps, seems to be based on this assumption of trustable train of thoughts. And given the simple experiment I mentioned, it is extremely dangerous and misleading

• take a look at this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xx4Tpsk_fnM : everything is based on observing and directing this internal reasoning, and these guys are computer scientists. How can they trust this?

So having a good written article at hand is a good idea imho

What are your interests?

Anyway you could try following this community: https://lemmy.world/c/peertube