• 1 Post
  • 557 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle






  • I think those are just semantics.

    I get the feeling of not wanting to criminalize the existence of a person.

    But it’s common language to say that civil infractions are illegal.

    You could totally say “It’s illegal to park here” even if you would just get a ticket for that.

    I get the feeling. But I don’t think it is rational to think that anyone writing “illegal immigration” is racist.


  • I’ve heard a very compelling one actually. It’s not about ilegal immigration but against immigration in general. I heard it in a youtube talk maybe like a decade ago.

    It starts stating that the thing a migrant person wants the most is not having to emigrate. No one wants go have to leave their country because they cannot safely live a prosper life there. So the best outcome would be that the origin countries would change, so people wouldn’t have leave everything behind to start a new life abroad. The problem is that the country have to change from inside. And the people leaving a country is usually the most qualified to make that change happen. So by leaving the country they make the change harder or even impossible.

    I’m not arguing in favour or against this argument. But I do not think it has anything to do with race whatsoever. As it doesn’t even talk about anything related to migrant presence in a receiving country.











  • 100% the knight.

    Steel armor is quite resistant, and the lion doesn’t have anything that could realistically penetrate it or blunt it.

    Even without weapon once they are entangled into a fight there’s two outcomes, the lion runs away once it notices it’s fighting a moving rock. Or the lion gets tired, once tired the human can beat it to death even without a weapon. Humans are famous for their resistance, we have more stamina for long fights and the presence of an armor will make the fight long.

    If the human have a weapon there isn’t even a contest.