The server would probably just get defederated.

I love ubuntu snaps.

(sets phone on vibrate)

Oh, that’s valid, and forks could be called “asexual propagation”

Cherry picking from one trunk to another could be called grafting.

There is already pruning.

If there is no AI used, it could be called GMO.

I’m not sure if there is a tree analogy for merging trunks together, however.

Cause git doesn’t work that way. There is no trunk. It’s all branches.

I watched that cage match when it happened. Mankind lost a tooth, if I remember correctly.

Well that’s just straight mean to fags.

It just bothers me that “master” branch is a misnomer. It’s a hold over from CVS/SVN where there was actually a central authoritative branch. I’m not necessary saying the other reasons don’t have merit, as well.

The best reason is always in the comments

I think it’s funny they ask women this and not men. Like who do they think the women are kissing exactly.

I’d agree easily. I’d even pay. Especially if her friend is single too. Doubles the odds and probably more fun conversation.

I feel master as in “master copy” is sort of problematic too. Git has no concept of “master” as a “master copy”. All the clones and forks are the same fidelity as the original. It’s a hold over from source control which did have an authoritative repo like SVN/CVS.

They are actually different. Yes has the accent.

Si = if

Sí = yes

That’s fair.

Forced perspective? That’s what she said.

Fair, I’ve used it recently to translate a translations.ts file to Spanish.

But for repetitive code, I feel like it is kind of a slow down sometimes. I should have refactored instead.

I mean… At best it’s a stack overflow/google replacement.

I unsubscribed. Wasn’t really even using it.

Floof is win

Delete Facebook, floof up, get rich

True, but so was Windows.