More to the point. Making a cheap phone is not an affordable endeavour.
Linux phone makers such as pine have discovered this in the past. As your first products are going to be low demand. Running a business on the profit margins of lower priced phones becomes hard. It seriously limits your ability to gain investments. Making competition with similar priced products insanely complex.
arrested on suspicion” in the UK does not evoke the same horror
It dose now it is clearly being used as a act to silence political protest.
Suspicious of malicious communication. When it is very clear the intent was to protest gov actions. And not to threaten or offend.
Is entirely about silencing gov opposition and in no way acceptable or democratic.
No. They claimed it was malicious communication. iE sent to offend or threaten.
Utter bollocks and a clear sign the police see censorship on behalf of the gov as a job role now.
Yep but are still applicable to the UK. As those laws have not (yet) been recinded.
Unlike the US. Parliament is entirely sovereign and has no legal limit on laws it can create. But we do have a history of supporting freedom of speech way older then 1998.
Because in the early 2000s Open office was given a fuck load of publicity by sun and then oracle. As such it is still the first name many less OS informed think of when they think of an open source office suite.
Libreoffice has simply never had that sa,e level of publicity.
It is still to this day a fucking fight to convince many who look for an alternative to Microsoft. That Libreoffice is the true OpenOffice replacement.
Sure when you find any source indication open source did not exist as a term,
Untill then stop being an arsehole and consider the fact old gits remember shit.
Maybe but I’m assuming you are far to young to have worked on and pre x86 arch. So assuming is only making you the arse.
I worked on many software products calling them self open source pre stallmans popularity.
It literally was the only way software commercial could have a large marketing base in the early days. Pre home PC etc.
Pre internet links are hard. I grew up using these versions of open source.
IBM SCO and sun formed Open source licences that were very literally you got to see and change the source.
In the 60 as CPU tech was a minefield of different ideas and architecture. It was the only way companies your keep up with mainframe PCs.
You will need to go to a library with microfiche and hubd down the 1960s open source magazine if you want more then actual old farts telling you the truth,
Unfortunately you fail to understand the history. Stall man FSF etc is a relatively new organisation started in the 80s.
Open source was a term long before that. And it was created by early Unix commercial dostros in the 60s. There were magazines etc dedicated to it as a mess with to allow commercial software to spread to multiple platforms. Long before stallmans free as in beer attitude.
So no the other licences have a place in history and are open source even if you and I may not support their ideals.
This is why words like libre and free software were formed to include our expanded ideals.
Only some definitions of open source state that. The concept has existed long before the free software foundation.
While personally agree with the FSF. To say it is an exclusive definition of open source is just outright false.
Yeah. I guessed that. But I doubt it is registered as a trade mark. So Google can still cause issues.
Although it comes down to if the use can be confused. That is not normally decided by technical conpidence.
Yep.
My guess haveing delt with the process. Moving to a green card process supported by marriage. Meant her student visas no longer applied. Only being married for 1 year. As this is why such claims are temp to begin. Means she may be deported well before her student plans are complete.
Even before the current insanity. Things like that were risky.
Is not naming it the same as googles new AI a bit risky.
After 2 180s you are pointing the right way or never were.
Given at some point trump was not in charge. Seems another angle is needed for them all to be idiotic.
They are idiotic just not 180s
So can any nation with its own currency. Its has a cost in the value of the currency though.
I think you underestimate the hate.
For the organisations that want to deny the ideals suggested. Using software under such a licence would lose them support. So when developers select such a licence. The software itself gets recognised as such. Meaning any shitty organisation using it gets labeled unacceptable to their very user base.
So requiring the acceptance of these facts would have the same effect as anything else.
I think such a licence would need very careful wording. Wording that concentrates on the entity or organisation using rather then jurisdiction.
GPL claims free as in speech not beer. Whereas this would be removing that very concept. By suggesting use for some ideas is not allowed.
I can def see the advantage. Especially for people developing social software. But trying to form a licence like that. While not running fowl of existing GPL restrictions. Would take some seriose legal understanding. As making gpled current libraries incompatible. Could totally remove existing work to expand upon. Removing most developers desire to place the effort needed for the new software.
Would be interesting to watch the project form though. Unfortunately it would be very much like watching a dangerous stunt. Facinating as much for the risk of failure as that of hoping for success.
The political direction of other nations. Honestly it is what all wealthy nations use aid for.
Homeless are likely cheaper.
Not to mention he can likely claim a tax break for charity donations to them.
In James bond movies yes. But most are written well before drones and very cheap thermal cameras.
It is pretty easy with modern equipment to monitor body heat in water. With the addition of AI very easy to ID human Vs fish both by shape and differing body temps.
But I’m no more a real general then yourself. So back to the armchair.